MANAGEMENT THEORY

Evaluation of the trade integration’s potential of far Eastern federal district and Asia-Pacific region on the basis of the spatial gravity model
Kuznetsova N.V., Doctor of Economic Science, Professor, Department of World Economy, School of Economics and Management, Far Eastern Federal University, Russia, 690950
Matev N.A., старшийпреподаватель Department of Business Informatics and Mathematic Methods in Economics, School of Economics and Management, Far Eastern Federal University, Russia
Kocheva E.V., PhD, Department of Business Informatics and Mathematic Methods in Economics, School of Economics and Management, Far Eastern Federal University

Annotation:
It is evaluated the potential of trade integration of Far Eastern Federal District and Asia-Pacific region on the basis of spatial gravity patterns. It should be noted that in this research we created the gravity model which reflect the foreign economic relations with Far Eastern Federal District and the analyzed countries of Asia-Pacific Region, and Russia with the main partner countries in this region.
Keywords:  Asia-Pacific Region, Far Eastern Federal District, gravity model, foreign economic relations.

The results of this research were achieved within the frameworks of the governmental assignmentof Russian Ministry of Education and Science in the sphere of scientific researches during the researching assignment № 26.1478.2014/K “The structural transformation of Russian Economy through the integration installation in the industrial markets of Asia-Pacific Region”.

Referenses
1. Kaukin, A., Idrisov, G. Gravitacionnaya model' vneshnei torgovli Rossii: sluchai bol'shoi po ploshadi strany s protyazhennoi granicei // «Analitika i prognoz», №4. – 2013. – S. 133-154
2. Kaukin, A.S. Osobennosti empiricheskih ocenok gravitacionnoi modeli vneshnei torgovli Rossii // «Rossiiskii vneshneekonomicheskii vestnik», №4. – 2013. – S. 71-84
3. Troekurova, I.S., Pelevina, K.A. Gravitacionnye modeli vneshnei torgovli stran BRIKS // «Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta». Seriya «Ekonomika, upravlenie, pravo». T.14, vyp. 1, ch.2. – 2014. – S. 133-142
4. Oficial'nyi sait Federal'noi tamozhennoi sluzhby Rossii [Elektronnyi resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: customs.ru/
5. Oficial'nyi sait InternationalMonetaryFound [Elektronnyi resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: data.imf.org/
6. Anderson, J. E. (2011) The Gravity Model. «Annual Review of Economics», No. 3 (1). – 2011, pp. 133–160.

STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT

The management system as a limiting factor of productivity growth of russian companies
Kulikov M., a leading economist of CJSC “Aeromar”
Khachaturov A., Dr. of Sc., Prof., the Head of the Chair of Management and Marketing of D. Mendeleyev University Chemical Technology of Russia

Annotation:
The article is devoted to the search for ways to increase productivity of Russian companies, and assessing the impact of external and internal environment factors’ of the organization on productivity. The influence of integration and disintegration processes in productivity. The technique of comparative analysis of the productivity of companies.
Keywords: productivity, impacts on productivity, wages fund, EBITDA, the technique of comparative analysis of productivity of companies.

Referenses
1. Rosstat // Rezhim dostupa: gks.ru/bgd/regl/b14_39/Main.htm
2. Finansovaya otchetnost Aeroflot za 2014 god v sootvetstvii s MSFO // Rezhim dostupa: aeroflot.ru/cms/files/u12/Aeroflot_FS_2014_RUS_02032015.pdf
3. Lufthansa’s Financial Statement 2014 // Rezhim dostupa: investor-relations.lufthansagroup.com/fileadmin/downloads/en/financial-reports/financial-statements/LH-FS-2014-e.pdf
4. Finansovaya otchetnost NLMK za 2014 god v sootvetstvii s MSFO // Rezhim dostupa: nlmk.com/ru/investor-relations/fin-results/income-statement
5. US Steel’s Financial Statement 2014 // Rezhim dostupa: https://ussteel.com/uss/portal/home/investors/financialresults
6. Zhurnal «The Economist» // Rezhim dostupa: economist.com/news/special-report/21621237-digital-revolution-has-yet-fulfil-its-promise-higher-productivity-and-better
7. Druker, Piter, F., Makyarello, Dzhozef A. Menedzhment.: – M.: OOO «I.D. Vilyams», 2010.
8. Prakhalad K. K., Khamel G. Klyuchevaya kompetentsiya korporatsii // VestnikSPbGU. Ser. 8. - 2003. - Vyp. 3 (№ 24). - S. 18-41.
9. Prakhalad K. K., Ramasvami V. Budushcheye konkurentsii:  Sozdaniye unikalnoy tsennosti vmeste s potrebitelyami / Per. s angl. – M.: ZAO «Olimp – Biznes», 2011. – 352 s.
10. Rosstat // Rezhim dostupa: gks.ru/wps/wcm/connect/rosstat_main/rosstat/ru/statistics/population/demography/#
11. Organizatsii Ekonomicheskogo Sotrudnichestva i Razvitiya // Rezhim dostupa: https://data.oecd.org
12. Rosstat // Rezhim dostupa: gks.ru/bgd/regl/b14_13/Main.htm
13. Rosstat // Rezhim dostupa: gks.ru/wps/wcm/connect/rosstat_main/rosstat/ru/statistics/accounts/#
14. Rosstat // Rezhim dostupa: gks.ru/bgd/regl/b14_13/Main.htm

Justification of the selection of innovative projects based on strategic positioning
Gileva T.A., Doctor of economics science, Docent, Professor of Entrepreneurship Economics Chair, Ufa State Aviation Technical University

Annotation:
An approach to the justification of choosing an innocative project, considering the project as an instrument of strategy implementation and based on the relationship of positioning strategy and enterprise’s business model was proposed. The basic steps of selecting and methods for their implementation were picked out. A method of selecting an innovative project based on the level of compliance of the project’s business model, integrated project design the risk level and the integrated performance index was developed. The composition of the relevant criteria and rating scales were determined.
Keywords; strategic positioning, enterprise strategy, strategy implementation, business model, innovative project selection criteria.

Referenses
1. Ismagilova L.A., Gilyova T.A., Galimova M.P. Metodika obosnovaniya vybora investi-cionnogo proekta v innovacionnoy ekonomike // Innovacionnaya deyatelnost. – 2015. – № 1. – S. 63 – 73.
2. Kozin E.F. Etapy i metody ocenki effektivnosti innovacionnyh proektov: strukturnye vzaimosvyazi // Innovacii. – 2012. – № 1. – S. 100 – 104.
3. Evans V. Klyuchevye strategicheskie instrumenty. 88 instrumentov, kotorye dolzhen znat kazhdyy menedzher. – M.: BINOM. Laboratoriya znaniy, 2015.
4. Traut Dzh., Rays. E. Pozicionirovanie. Bitva za uznavaemost. – SPb.: Piter, 2015.
5. Huley Dzh. Marketing. Biznes-klass. – SPb.: Piter, 2006.
6. powerbranding.ru/pozicionirovanie/
7. Tompson A., Striklend A.Dzh. Strategicheskiy menedzhment: koncepcii i situacii dlya analiza. – M.: Izdatelskiy dom «Vilyams», 2007.
8. Magretta J. Why Business Models Matter // Harvard Business Review. – 2002. – Vol. 80. – P. 86-92.
9. Shafer S. M., Smith H. J., Linder J. C. The power of business models // Business horizons. – 2005. – Vol. 48 (3). – P. 199–207.
10. Ostervalder A., Pine I. Postroenie biznes-modeley. – M.: Alpina Pablisher, 2013.
11. Slivocki A., Morrison D., Andelman B. Zona pribyli. – M.: Eksmo, 2006.
12. Seddon P. B., Lewis G. P., Freeman P., Shanks G. The case for viewing business models as abstractions of strategy // Communications of the Association for Information Systems. – 2004. – Vol. 13 (1). – P. 427–442.
13. Casadesus-Masanell R., Ricart J. E. From strategy to business models and onto tactics // Long Range Planning. – 2010. – Vol. 43 (2). – P. 195–215.
14. Teece D. J. Business Models, Business Strategy and Innovation // Long Range Planning. – 2010. – Vol. 43 (2–3). – P. 172–194.
15. Bereznoy A. Innovacionnye biznes-modeli v konkurentnoy strategii krupnyh kor-poraciy // Voprosy ekonomiki. – 2014. – № 9. – S. 65 – 81.
16. Efremov V. S. Strategicheskoe planirovanie v biznes-sistemah. – M.: Izdatelstvo «Finpress», 2001.
17. Trachuk A. Innovacionnaya strategiya kompanii // Problemy teorii i praktiki uprav-leniya. – 2013. – № 9. – S. 75 – 83.
18. Shturmin F.S., Hachaturov A.E. Formirovanie strategii innovacionnogo razvitiya promyshlennyh predpriyatiy // Menedzhment v Rossii i za rubezhom. – 2013. – № 6. – S. 32 – 38.
19. Baev A.A., Litke M.G. K voprosu o formirovanii sistemy kriteriev ocenki i upravleniya innovacionnym potencialom proekta // Menedzhment v Rossii i za rubezhom. – 2014. – № 5. – S. 18 – 24.
20. Gaponenko A., Saveleva M. Tradicionnye i novye faktory konkurentosposobnosti organizaciy // Problemy teorii i praktiki upravleniya. – 2015. – № 5. – S. 117 – 124.
21. Gilyova T.A. Razvitie intellektualnogo kapitala predpriyatiya: metody i instrumenty // Menedzhment v Rossii i za rubezhom. – 2014. – № 3. – S. 119 – 126.
22. Bruce E., J. Burchell D. Innovation: lane. from English. - M .: Delo and Service, 2011.

Business strategy of company’s expansion to the external market
Korolev V.I., Doctor of Economics, Professor, Head of management and marketing Chair Russian Foreign Trade Academy

Annotation:
Business strategy as a concept is deeply used in the modern economic science. It is determined as a system, covering different sub-systems. The expansion method to the external market is based on several methodological principles. The development of this mechanism is concerned, firstly with the evaluation of company’s export potential. The analyses of such instruments like export product choice, marketing area definition and marketing penetration forms is presented. A special attention is given to the ways of forming competitive advantages.
Keywords: business strategy, export potential, competitive advantages.

Referenses
1. Rossiyskiye developer natchalimeniat’ strategii razvitiya iz-za krizisa. RBKn-rbk.ru/business/13/01/2015.
2. Udaltsova N.L. Organizatsionno-ekonomitcheskiy mehanizm funktsijnirovaniya otrasli natsional’noy ekonomiki. – ekonomitcheskiye nauki. 2012. № 6 (91). S. 94 ecsn.ru
3. Memorandum OAO «Plazmek» - Plasmeg – Plasmeg.ru
4. Belov A. Exportniye strategiyi naiboleye podkhodiyashiye rossiyskim kompaniyam – cfin.ru
5. Osnovniye problem vikhoda firmi na vneshniy rinok I strategiyi mejdunarodnogo marketinga – studopedia.info/1-79694.html
6. Vissema Н. Strategitcheskiy management I predprinimatel’stvo. – M.: Finpress.2000. S. 89-92

Geomarketing modeling of location the network of sales offices in the bank
Dolzhenko R.A., Ph.D., assistant professor, Department of Strategic Marketing, National Research University Higher School of Economics

Annotation:
The article discusses the possibility of using geomarketing as an instrument for modeling optimal location of the sales offices of the bank. The sequence of steps in the process of geomarketing modeling is described, recommendations on the implementation of each stages are highlighted. Methodical approaches to the implementation of geomarketing modeling the optimal network of sales offices of the bank is highlighted. Recommendations for the implementation of the planned placement points scoring sales offices are identified. The experience of the Savings Bank in the development and implementation of techniques geomarketing modeling is studied.
Keywords: bank, sales offices, geo-marketing, geomarketing modeling, network of sales offices, scoring, score-point.

Referenses
1. Cvetkov, V. Ja. Geomarketing: prikladnye zadachi i metody. – M.: Finansy i statistika, 2002.
2. Kirov, I. K. Teoreticheskie aspekty geomarketinga. // Marketing v Rossii i za rubezhom. 2002. №4. - S. 8 - 12.
3. Geomarketing // E-xecutive.ru. Jelektronnyj resurs. Rezhim dostupa: e-xecutive.ru/wiki/index.php/Geomarketing (data obrashhenija 26.02.2015)
4. Perekrest V.V., Rjumin M.Ju., Moiseeva N.K. Vlijanie prostranstvennogo faktora na povedenie potrebitelej tovarov i uslug. // Marketing uslug. – 2006. – № 2. – S. 106-122.
 

GOVERNANCE

About macroeconomic purpose of the strategic development of effective balanced macroeconomic systems
Vladimirov S.A., Professor, Department of General Management and Logistics, North-West Management Institute RANEPA

Annotation:
The purpose of this article is a theoretical substantiation of the possibility of DOS reaches the maximum possible public efficiencies of government spending, investments and taxes in perfect condition coordination bath open economic system. The proposed model can always bring in the ideal case («zero-loss» public effectively scope of public expenditure and investment) to the maximum possible rate of economic growth, that allows you to substantiate the main directions of the relevant macroeconomic (fiscal, tax and budget) policy.
Keywords: efficiency, macroeconomic, quality, a policy, taxes.

Assessment of the impact of agrarian resource potential of the region for its sustainable development
Yarotskaya E.V., Ph.D. in Economics, associate professor of department of land management and land cadaster of the Kuban state agrarian university
Hlevnaya A.V., lecturer of department of land management and land cadaster of the Kuban state agrarian university

Annotation:
The purpose of article is the assessment of extent of influence of structural elements of resource capacity of the agrarian region on the level of its sustainable development. The system of groups of indicators of resource capacity of the agrarian region is created. It is financial, climatic, labor and production potential. The model of multiple regression of panel data for ranging of factors was constructed. Indicators of Krasnodar Krai were taken as a basis for creation of model.
Keywords: sustainable development of territories, agrarian region, resource potential, model of multiple regression.

Referenses
1. Doklad o razvitii chelovecheskogo potenciala v Rossijskoj Federacii // Programma razvitija OON [Jelektronnyj resurs]. undp.ru/index.php?iso=RU&lid=2&cmd=publications1&id=49
2. Olejnik E. B. Analiz i ranzhirovanie faktorov po stepeni vozdejstvija na strukturu Dal'nevostochnogo lesopromyshlennogo kompleksa // Innovacionnaja jekonomika: informacija, analitika, prognozy. – 2012. – № 3. – S. 3-5
3. Regiony Rossii. Social'no-jekonomicheskie pokazateli // Federal'naja sluzhba gosudarstvennoj statistiki Rossijskoj Federacii [Jelektronnyj resurs]. gks.ru/bgd/regl/b14_14p/Main.htm
4. Trubilin I. T., Bershickij Ju. I., Barsukova G. N. Jeffektivnost' proizvodstvennyh faktorov v agrarnom sektore jekonomiki // Trudy Kubanskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta. – 2013. – № 45. – s. 72-77
5. Jarockaja E. V. Resursnyj potencial regionov kak osnova ih ustojchivogo razvitija // Investicii, stroitel'stvo i nedvizhimost' kak material'nyj bazis modernizacii i innovacionnogo razvitija jekonomiki: materialy Pjatoj Vserossijskoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem / Pod obshh.red. T.Ju. Ovsjannikovoj. – Tomsk: Izd-vo TGASU, 2015. – s. 44-56
6. Jarockaja E. V. Upravlenie imushhestvennymi riskami predprijatija: monografija. – Tomsk: Izd-vo Tomskogo poli-tehnicheskogo universiteta, 2011. – 131 s.
7. Jarockaja E. V., Hlevnaja A. V. Teoreticheskie podhody k ustojchivomu razvitiju sel'skih territorij // Voprosy i problemy jekonomiki i menedzhmenta v sovremennom mire: Sbornik nauchnyh trudov. – Omsk: Innovacionnyj centr razvitija obrazovanija i nauki, 2015. – S. 117-119м

BRANCH MANAGEMENT

Regularities of circulation of municipal solid waste: problems and decision ways
Buletova N.E., Associate Professor of Accounting, Analysis and Audit of Volgograd branch “Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration under the President of the Russian Federation” (Volgograd, Russia)

Annotation:
Accounting of regularities of municipal solid waste (MSW) treatment system to determine the priorities of government treatment of wastes, especially government programs as an example of ecological literacy and subject-object relations system participants treatment of MSW.
Keywords: municipal solid waste, SWOT-analysis, SMART-analysis, the pyramid factors of ecologic-economic development, program of ecological literacy.

The study was supported by RFBR under grant №16-06-00027 A "Patterns of ecological and economic development and their impact on the state of strategic management of the region"

Referenses
1. Rumina E.V., Tarasenko F.P. Analyz ekologo-ekonomicheskih vzaimodeistvij. M.: Nauka, 2000.
2. Zlochevskiy I.A., Buletova N.E. Gorod kak ekologo-ekonomicheskaya sistеma: diagnostika i uslovia obespecheniya bezopasnogo sostoyaniya // Upravlenie ekonomicheskimi sistemami: electronnij nauchnij zhurnal. 2013. № 7 (55). s. 28.
3. Kompleksnaya strategiya obrashcheniya s tverdimi kommunal’nimi (bytovymi) othodami v RF,  utverzhdennaya prikazom Minprirody Rosssii ot 14.08.2013g. № 298.
4.  Zakon Volgogradskoy oblasti ot 15.05.2003g. № 825-OD "Ob ekologicheskom obrazovanii v Volgogradskoy oblasti " (v redaktsii ot 11.25.2013g, № 159-OD).

Increase of competitiveness of network trading company: structural and dynamic analysis
Khokhlova T.P., cand.econ.sci., professor, head of the subdepartment of management and world economy of G.V. Plekhanov Russian Economic University, Krasnodar department

Annotation:
The factors forming competitiveness and competitive advantages of trading companies of a network format are investigated. Results of the analysis of competitiveness of the large Russian trading company are stated. Author's definition and the matrix of the assessment of competitive capacity of the trading company are offered. The competitiveness model, the program and target block of increase of competitiveness are adapted. The actions for strengthening of competitiveness of a company connected with realization of strategy of regional expansion and development of own retail network are developed.
Keywords: competitive potential, network trade, competitiveness profile, competitiveness model, matrix of competitive potential

Referenses
1. Porter M. Konkurentsiya. – M.: Dialectics-Williams, 2010.
2. Porter M. Konkurentnaya strategiya: metody analiza otraslei i konkurentov. – M.: Alpina Business Buks, 2005.
3. Rumjanceva E.E. Novaja jekonomicheskaja jenciklopedija. - M.: INFRA-M, 2011.
4. Skomoroshchenko A.A., Bespal'ko V.A. Otsenka konkurentosposobnosti predprinimatel'skikh struktur // Fundamental'nye i prikladnye issledovaniya kooperativnogo sektora ekonomiki. – 2013. - № 4. - S. 44-50.
5. Malenkov Yu., Dreving S. Formirovanie konkurentnoi strategii razvitiya // Problemy teorii i praktiki upravleniya. – 2009. - № 7. - S. 61-65.
6. Generalova S.V. Konceptual'nye osnovy upravlenija. Formirovanie konkurentnogo potenciala s pomoshh'ju metoda benchmarkinga // Problemy teorii i praktiki upravlenija. – 2007. - № 1. - S. 16-21.
7. Vavilov S.Yu., Khachaturov A.E. Strategicheskoe planirovanie kak programma dolgosrochnogo razvitiya i adaptacii klyuchevyh kompetencii kompanii // Menedzhment v Rossii i za rubezhom. – 2013. – № 1. – S. 4-17.
8. Efremov V.S., Hanykov I.A. Klyuchevaya kompetenciya organizacii kak ob'ekt strategicheskogo analiza // Menedzhment v Rossii i za rubezhom. - 2002. – № 2. – S. 8-33.
9. Hohlova T.P. Genezis kompetentnostno orientirovannoj modeli upravlenija: ot istokov k perspektivam // Menedzhment v Rossii i za rubezhom. – 2015. – № 1. – S. 4-13.
10. Agalakova O.S. Otsenka i povyshenie konkurentosposobnosti roznichnykh torgovykh predpriyatii: Monografiya O. S. Agalakova, O. V. Chkalova. - Vyatka State University of Humanities Kirov Publ., 2010.
11. Efremova M.V. Rynochnye mekhanizmy upravleniya razvitiem torgovli // Vestnik SamGUPS. – 2014. - № 3 (25). - S. 83-89.
12. Chkalova O.V., Nalivaiko K.A. Roznichnaya torgovlya Rossii v sovremennoi ekonomike // Ekonomicheskii analiz: teoriya i praktika. – 2015. - № 23 (422). - S. 16-25.
13. Bulatova I.S. Perspektivy razvitiya setevoi torgovli v Rossii // Sfera uslug: innovatsii i kachestvo. – 2015. - № 15.
14. Yudnikova E.S. Metodologicheskie osnovy izucheniya konkurentosposobnosti torgovogo predpriyatiya // Problemy sovremennoi ekonomiki. – 2007. - № 3 (23).
15. Zul'karnaev I.U., Il'yasova L.R. Metod rascheta integral'noi konkurentosposobnosti promyshlennykh, torgovykh i finansovykh predpriyatii // Marketing v Rossii i za rubezhom. – 2001. - № 4. - S. 17-27.
16. Ovchinnikova T. I., Popov M.V. Model' upravleniya konkurentosposobnost'yu predpriyatii i regionov // Menedzhment v Rossii i za rubezhom. – 2008. - № 2. - S. 81-89.
17. Karlina T. Struktura organizatsii i konkurentnye preimushchestva // Problemy teorii i praktiki upravleniya. – 2012. - № 6. - S. 76.
18. Gukasyan Z.O. Strategii i taktiki povedeniya sub"ektov biznesa v usloviyakh mirovogo finansovogo krizisa // Ekonomika i predprinimatel'stvo. – 2014. - № 4-2 (25). - S. 789-792.
19. Chkalova O.V. Razvitie liderov rossiiskogo torgovogo rynka na osnove strategii rosta // Menedzhment i biznes-administrirovanie. – 2013. - № 3. - S. 30-36.
20. Kofanov A.A., Nazaretyan P.V. Innovatika biznes-protsessov kak determinanta konkurentosposobnosti organizatsii // Sfera uslug: innovatsii i kachestvo. – 2014. - № 18.
21. Hohlova T.P., Nazaretyan P.V. Product placement kak global'naja strategija prodvizhenija tovarov i uslug: problemy i puti ih reshenija // Marketing v Rossii i za rubezhom. – 2011. - № 2. - S. 87-98.
22. Efremova M.V., Lunev V.V. Osobennosti upravleniya personalom v vysokokonkurentnykh torgovykh organizatsiyakh // Menedzhment v Rossii i za rubezhom. – 2014. - № 6. - S. 83-87.
 

TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT

Assessment of sustainable development of industrial complexes of manufacturing Perm krai
Lepikhin V.V., assistant lecturer (aspirant) of Economics and Finance Department, PNRPU
Lepikhin K.V., senior teacher of the Department of Economics Department, PSHPU
Kozonogova E.V., postgraduate student of Economics and Finance Department, PNRPU

Annotation:
The article investigates the evaluation questions industrial complex as a stable system, which consists of three subsystems: the environmental, economic, social. The article presents the results of the evaluation of integrated indicators that characterize the sustainable development of the manufacturing sector of the Perm region, allowing to determine the types of policies implemented in the framework of the studied plants. The possible instruments of state regulation of the process of sustainable development of industrial production, taking into account the results of the evaluation.
Keywords: sustainable development, ecological and socio-economic system, integrated assessment, management tools.

Referenses
1. Chikina E.D. Improved methods of evaluation and management of sustainable development of enterprises. Cand. econ. sci. diss. Belgorod, 2007. 179 p.
2. Borodin M.A. Development of methodology for assessing the potential of sustainable economic development of machine-building enterprises. Cand. econ. sci. diss. St. Petersburg, 2005. 172 p.
3. Il'icheva A.V. Methods of integrated evaluation of sustainable development of enterprises territorially-industrial complex of the meat (for example, the Krasnodar Territory) // Science and business: ways of their development. 2013. No. 9 (27). P. 112-117.
4. Makova M.M. Methodical bases of evaluation of sustainable development of oil complex enterprises // Herald VEGU. 2012. No (60). P. 53-60.
5. Perceva E.Ju. Implementing the concept of sustainable development of the company based on the design and methodology of the portfolio. Cand. ehkon. sci. diss. Moscow, 2011. 228 p.
6. Homjachenkova N.A. The mechanism of integrated sustainability assessment of industrial enterprises. Cand. ehkon. sci. author. diss. Moscow, 2011. 21 p.
7. Korjakov A.G. Management of a sustainable development of industrial enterprises. Dr. ehkon. sci. author. diss. Moscow, 2012. 44 p.
8. Kokin A.S., Jakovleva G.N. Indicators of sustainability of the organization // Bulletin of the Nizhny Novgorod University behalf N.I. Lobachevskogo. 2010. No. 3(1). P. 256–261
9. Pavlova O. Ju. Factors economic sustainability of the pulp and paper industry // Proceedings of the Russian State Pedagogical University behalf A.I. Gercena. 2009. No. 93. P. 136-140.
10. Vahromov E. N., D. Ju. Markarjan Evaluation of sustainable development and functioning of the enterprise: the factors and criteria, especially // Herald ASTU. 2008. No. 4. P.52-62.
11. Mochalova L.A. Methodology and mechanisms to ensure environmental sustainability of industrial enterprise. Dr. ehkon. sci. author. diss. Ekaterinburg, 2009. 39 p.
12. Jarulina G.R. Management of sustainable economic development of the enterprises of industrial complex: the theory and methodology. Dr. ehkon. sci. author. diss. Kazan, 2011. 29 p.
13. Redina M.M. Methodological principles of ecological and economic stability of the oil and gas companies. Dr. ehkon. sci. author. diss. Moscow, 2011. 44 p.
14. Rogacheva A.M. Assessment of the stability of vertically integrated oil companies in Russia. Cand. ehkon. sci. author. diss. Ufa, 2007. 23 p.
15. Hachaturov-Tavrizjan A.E. Methodological bases of formation of integrated economic and environmental management of industrial enterprises. Dr. ehkon. sci. author. diss. Moscow, 2006. 41 p.
16. Gorin S.V. Ensuring the sustainability of industrial enterprises on the basis of management of business reputation. Dr. ehkon. sci. author. diss. Moscow, 2011. 52 p.
17. Dreving S.R. Dreving Formation of the mechanism of sustainable development of enterprises: On materials of the fishing industry of the Kamchatka area. Cand. ehkon. sci. author. diss. St. Petersburg, 2003. 22 p.
18. Kolosova T. V. Ensuring sustainable development of the company by improving its innovation potential. Dr. ehkon. sci. author. diss. Nizhnij Novgorod, 2011. 44 p.
19. Shestakov A.B. The mechanism of planning for sustainable development of industrial enterprise. Cand. ehkon. sci. author. diss. Moscow, 2009. 22 p.
20. Birjukov S.E. Formation mechanisms for sustainable development of industrial enterprise. Cand. ehkon. sci. author. diss. Vladimir, 2006. 23 p.
21. Zinger O.A. Formation of the sustainable development strategy of industrial enterprise. Cand. ehkon. sci. author. diss. Penza, 2010. 23 p.
22. Ljushina Je.Ju. Management of a sustainable development of industrial enterprises. Cand. ehkon. sci. author. diss. Nizhnij Novgorod, 2004. 26 p.
23. Pechatkina E.Ju., Men'shikova N.V. Reflective sustainability management joint-stock enterprise // Herald of Chelyabinsk State University. 2011. No. 36. P. 137-142
24. Damaev D.V. Comprehensive assessment of the sustainable development of industrial enterprises: a methodical approach. Cand. ehkon. sci. author. diss. Novosibirsk, 2005. 24 p.
25. Prjanichnikov S.B. Innovative transformation as a dominant factor in ensuring sustainable development of the enterprise // Management of economic systems - 2012 [electronic resource] / - Access mode: uecs.ru/uecs-38-382012/item/1086-2012-02- 28-05-51-07 (accessed 10.23.2015).
26. Klevcov S.M. Integral assessment of sustainable development of industrial complexes based on indicators of economic value added // Modern trends in science and technology. 2015. No. 4-4. P. 20-22.
27. Skopin A.O., Ovchinnikova E.N. Research and design of the system of management of regional industrial complex // Modern technologies of management. 2011. No. 12. P. 40-47.
28. Korchagina E.V. Analysis and evaluation of sustainable social, ecological and economic systems. Dr. ehkon. sci. diss. Gatchina, 2012. 377 p.
29. Perskij Ju.K., Lepihin V.V., Semjonova E.V. The methodology and models for assessing industrial enterprise as a stable system. // Bulletin of Perm State University. Series: Economy. 2015. No 1 (24). P. 103 – 110.
30. Samochkin V.N., BarachovV.I., KuznetsovV.P. Flexible development of enterprises and corporations. – M .: Delo and Service, 2014.

Controlling of business processes in industrial holdings
Khlevnaya Е.А., Ph.D. in Economics and Psychology, associated Prof. of the business analysis and audit department of the Russian Economic University of G.V. Plekhanov

Annotation:
The article considers the problem of controlling of business processes in industrial holding company. The structural elements of the controlling system, the sequence of their interaction and application with the aim of improving the efficiency of business processes are showed. Presents criteria for evaluating the management effectiveness of business processes. Contents concepts: monitoring of business processes, control the degree of achievement of the set strategic and operational objectives, the interaction of parent and subsidiary companies in the holding structure.
Keywords: сontrolling, business processes of organization, performance criteria, monitoring of business processes.

Referenses
1. Parmenter, D. (2007). Key Performance Indicators: Developing, Implementing, and Using Winning KPIs. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
2. Scheer, A.W., Kruppke, H., Jost, W. & Kindermann, H. (2007). Agility by ARIS Business Process Management. Berlin: Springer.
3. Giacosa, E., Mazzoleni, A. 2011. The Behaviour of Companies Facing a Crisis : The Recent Italian Experience [online]. In EBS Review. 2011. No. 28. Pр. 7–22.
4. Kueting, K. – Heiden, M. Controlling in internationalen Unternehmen [online]. In Controlling in internationalen Unternehmen. Pр. 288–298.

ENTERPRISE MANAGEMENT

Method of calculating the value in use of consumer products depending on the quality indicators and assessment of economic efficiency
Alexandrov S.P., Moscow State University of Technology and Management named K.G. Rasumovsky (FCU), Dr.Sc (Eng), professor, head of Chair “Technology of leather, Fur and Leather Goods”
Dontsova L.V., Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, Dr.Sc (Ec), prof. of Department “Analysis of Economic Activity”
Shestov A.V., Moscow State University of Technology and Management named K.G. Rasumovsky (FCU), РhD, ass. prof. of Department “Management”

Annotation:
Considered on the basis of market conditions relationship between the levels of quality and value in use the product. Numerical value of a particular indicator is found for similar product.Value in the product are determined on the base of current market prices. It provides an innovative method for assessing products and tradition technologies. The economic effect is calculated by criterion of public product of labor.
Keywords: parameter of quality, value in use, market counterparts, calculated dependence, direct comparison method, economic efficiency, public product of labor.

Referenses
1. Kommentarii k ISO 9000:2005 [Elektronnyiy resurs]. pqm-online.com/assets/files/iso9000-review.pdf. Provereno 25.03.2015.
2. Mishin V.M. Upravlenie kachestvom – M.: YuNITI – DANA, 2005.
3. Aleksandrov S.P., Berdnikova I.P. Otsenka promyishlennoy robotizatsii po kriteriyu proizvoditelnosti obschestvennogo truda // Tehnologiya XXI veka v pischevoy, pererabatyivayuschey i legkoy promyishlennosti ENI.- 2014.- № 8.- chast 1.
4. Volchkevich L.I. Avtomatizatsiya proizvodstvennyih protsessov / L.I. Volchkevich M.: Mashinostroenie, 2005.
5. Zhukovskaya T.V. Tehnologiya polucheniya formoustoychivoy obuvi iz nizkosortnoy naturalnoy kozhi s primeneniem nizkotemperaturnoy plazmyi: avtoref. dis. k-ta tehn.nauk: 05.19.05. Kazanskiy natsionalnyiy issledovatelskiy universitet. –Kazan, 2012.- 20s.
6. Pat. 2556166 Rossiyskaya Federatsiya. MPK A43D 11/00, S23S 14/56. Avtomatizirovannoe ustroystvo prohodnogo tipa dlya plazmennoy obrabotki zagotovok verha obuvi /Aleksandrov S.P., Berdnikova I.P., Abdullin I.Sh., zayavitel i patentoobladatel MGUTU im. K.G.Razumovskogo (PKU). - № 20131000116/02 . zayavl. 09.01.2013, opubl. 20.07.2014. Byul. № 19-9s: pl.
7. Pat. 2542567 Rossiyskaya Federatsiya. MPK A43D 8/00, A43D 95/100. Avtomatizirovannoe ustroystvo reversivnogo tipa dlya plazmennoy obrabotki zagotovok verha obuvi /Aleksandrov S.P., Berdnikova I.P., Abdullin I.Sh., zayavitel i patentoobladatel MGUTU im. K.G. Razumovskogo (PKU). -№ 2013100117/12.zayavl.09.01.2013, opubl. 20.02.2015. Byul.№ 5-9s.: pl.

Structural and communication approach to the formation of the management system of technical support of the university
Knyazeva Yu.S., Don state technical university, lecturer of department “Marketing and engineering economics”
Simonyan T.V., Don state technical university, prof. of department “Marketing and engineering economics”

Annotation:
The article describes the functions and organizational structure of the Technical University; the dependence of the intensity of the organizational changes of various factors . Presented by the formation of a matrix organizational structure of the technical support of the University with the use of mobile information and communication structures , which is formed through the imposition of the existing linear- functional structure of horizontal connections.
Keywords: supporting regional university, technical university, management system, mobile information – communication system.

Referenses
1. Panaedova G.I. Osobennosti i tendencii razvitiya sistemy vysshego obrazovaniya v sovremennoi Rossii // Sbornik materialov mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-praktich. konf «Modernizaciya ekonomiki i upravleniya» mart 2013 goda. Severo-Kavkazskii federal'nyi universitet. – Stavropol': Stavropol'lit, 2013. – S. 322-331.
2. Bondarenko V.A. Voprosy adekvatnosti menedzhmenta sovremennym ekonomicheskim realiyam: kornevye prichiny i osnovnye tendencii // «Menedzhment v Rossii i za rubezhom». M., 2013, – № 3. –S.118-125.
3. Knyazeva Yu.S., Simonyan T.V. Diagnostika sistemy upravleniya tehnicheskogo Universiteta na osnove sovremennyh instrumentov menedzhmenta // «Vestnik Donskogo gosudarstvennogo tehnicheskogo universiteta». Rostov-na-Donu. – 2015. – № 1(80).– S.138-143.
4. Knyazeva. Yu.S. Model' nepreryvnogo sovershenstvovaniya sistemy menedzhmenta tehnicheskogo universiteta// Nauka i obrazovanie: hozyaistvo i ekonomika; predprinimatel'stvo i upravlenie – Rostov-na-Donu. – 2015. – № 2 (57). – S.18-26.

STUFF MANAGEMENT

An organizational culture of family companies: the key features
Korchagina E.V., Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Professor, National Research University Higher School of Economics, St. Petersburg
Shilo P.G., Associate professor, National Research University Higher School of Economics, St. Petersburg, expert, Non-Commercial Partnership «North West Corporate Governance Center»

Annotation:
The article investigates features of the organizational culture of a family firm which arises from the influence of a family culture. We consider the different approaches to the organizational culture characteristics detection that are important for the analysis of the family companies. We describe the characteristics of the family which allows its members to create and develop a sustainable and efficient family business.
Keywords:  family business, organizational culture, ethical values.

Referenses
1. Peters, T. and Waterman, R. 1982. In Search of Excellence. Lessons from America’s Best Run Companies. New York: Harper and Row Publishers.
2. Sorensen J. 2002. The strength of corporate culture and the reliability of firm performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47, 70–91.
3. Lee C. and Chen W. 2005. The effects of internal marketing and organizational culture on knowledge management in the information technology industry. International Journal of Management, 22, 661–672.
4. Gallo M. 1993. Cultura en Empresa Familiar. In M. Gallo (Ed.), La Empresa Familiar 4 (pp. 225–249). Barcelona: IESE, Publicaciones de la Catedra de Empresa Familiar.
5. Gallo M. 1995. La Empresa Familiar. Textos y Casos. Barcelona: Praxis.
6. Dyer W.G., Jr.  1986. Cultural change in family firms: Anticipating and managing business and family traditions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
7. Ainsworth S. and Wolfram C.J. 2003. Families Divided: Culture and Control in Small Family Business. Organization Studies, 24(9), 1463–1485.
8. Aronoff C. 2004. Self-Perpetuation Family Organization Built on Values: Necessary Condition for Long-Term Family Business Survival. Family Business Review, 17(1), 55–59.
9. Denison D., Lief C.  and Ward J.L. 2004. Culture in Family-Owned Enterprises: Recognizing and Leveraging Unique Strengths. Family Business Review, 17(1), 61–70.
10. Dyer W.G., Jr. 2003. The Family: The Missing Variable in Organizational Research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27(4), 401–416.
11. Viedma J. 1990. La excelencia empresarial espanola. Barcelona: Viama Editors.
12. Collins J. and Porras J. 1996. Empresas que perduran. Barcelona: Paidos.
13. Simon H. 1997. Lideres en la sombra. Barcelona: Planeta.
14. Sathe V.  1985. How to decipher and change corporate culture? In R. Kilman, M. Saxton, R. Serpa, & Associates (Eds.), Gaining control of corporate culture (pp. 230–261). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
15. Koiranen M. 2002. Over 100 Years of Age But Still Entrepreneurially Active in Business: Exploring the Values and Family Characteristics of Old Finnish Family Firms. Family Business Review, 15(3), 175– 187.
16. Craig J.  and  Dibrell C.  2006. The Natural Environment, Innovation and Firm Performance: A Comparative Study, Family Business Review, 19(4), 275–288.
17. Kelly L.M., Athanassiou N. and Crittenden W.F. 2000. Founder Centrality and Strategic Behavior in the Family-Owned Firm. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25(2), 27–42.
18. Vallejo M.C. 2008. Is the Culture of Family Firms Really Different? A Value-Based Model for Its Survival Through Generations. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(2), 261–279.
19. Donckels R. and  Frohlick E. 1991. Are family business really different? European experiences from STRATOS. Family Business Review, 4, 149–160.
20. Kets de Vries M. 1993. The Dynamics of Family Controlled Firms: The Good and the Bad News. Organizational Dynamics, 21(3), 59–71.
21. Бархатова Н.М.  Семейный бизнес и семьи в бизнесе // ЭКО: Экономика и организация промышленного производства. – 1999. – № 2 [Электронный ресурс]. ecotrends.ru/component/content/article/741-1999/1841-2014-03-06-10-13-03
22. Волков Д.А. Семейный бизнес: владение, управление и семейные ценности // Российское предпринимательство. – 2012. – № 13 (211). – С. 38–44.
23. Mandl I. 2008. Overview of Family Business Relevant Issues. Final Report, Austrian Institute for SME Research,Vienna. ec.europa.eu/enterprise/entrepreneurship/craft/family_business/family_business_en.htm
24. Westehead P. and Cowling M. 1997. Performance Contrasts Between Family and Non-Family Unquoted Companies in the UK. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 3(1), 30–39.
25. Westhead P. and Howorth C. 2006. Ownership and Management Issues Associated with Family Firm Performance and Company Objectives. Family Business Review, 19(4), 301–316.
26. Barnett T. and Kellermanns F.W. 2006. Are We Family and Are We Treated as Family? Nonfamily Employees’ Perception of Justice in the Family Firm. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(6), 837–854.
27. Dyer W.G., Jr.  1988. Culture and Continuity in Family Firms. Family Business Review, 1(1), 37–50.
28. Duh M., Belak J. and Milfelner B. 2010. Core Values, Culture and Ethical Climate as Constitutional Elements of Ethical Behaviour: Exploring Differences Between Family and Non-Family Enterprises. Journal of Business Ethics, 97:473–489.
29. Leach P. 1993. La Empresa Familiar. Barcelona: Granica.
30. Lee J. 2006. Family firm performance: Further evidence. Family Business Review, 19, 103–114.
31. Moscetello L. 1990. The Pitcairns want you. Family Business Magazine, February, 3–15.
32. Adams J., Tashchian A. and Shore T. 1996. Ethics in family and non-family owned firms: An exploratory study. Family Business Review, 9, 157–170.
33. Ward J. and Aronoff G. 1991. Trust gives you the advantage. Nation’s Business, 79, 42–44.
34. Neubauer F. and Lank A. 1998. The family business: Its governance for sustainability. Hampshire: McMillan Business.
35. Tagiuri R. and Davis J.A. 1996. Bivalent attributes of the family firm. Family Business Review, 9, 199–208.
36. Ward J.  1988. The special role of strategic planning for family businesses. Family Business Review, 1, 105–117.
37. Iles P., Foster A. and  Tinline G.  1996. The changing relationship between work commitment, personal flexibility and employability: An evaluation of field experiment in executive development, Journal of Managerial Psychology, 11, 18–35.
38. De Quijano S., Navarro J. and Cornejo J. 2000. Un Modelo Integrado de Compromiso e Identificacion con la Organizacion: Analisis del Cuestionario ASH-ICI. Revista de Psicologia Social Aplicada, 10, 27–60.
39. Allen N. and Meyer J. 1990. The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 1–18.
40. Meyer J. and Allen N. 1984. Testing the side-bet theory of organizational commitment: Some methodological considerations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 372–378.
41. Meyer J. and Allen N. 1991. A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1, 61–89.
42. Morrow P.  1993. The theory and measurement of work commitment. Greenwich: Jai Press.
43. Bush A., Smith R.  and Martin C. 1999. The influence of consumer socialization variables on attitude toward advertising: A comparison of African-Americans and Caucasians. Journal of Advertising, 28, 13–24.
44. Trostel A.  and  Nichols M. 1982. Private-held and publicly held companies: A comparison of strategic choices and management processes. Academy of Management Journal, 25, 47–62.
45. McGregor D. 1960. The human side of enterprise. New York: McGraw-Hill.
46. Goffee R. and Scase R. 1985. Proprietorial control in family firms: Some Functions of quasiorganic management systems. Journal of Management Studies, 22, 54–68.
47. Tagiuri R. and Davis J. 1992. On the goals of successful family companies. Family Business Review, 5, 43–62.
48. Daily C.M. and Dollinger M.J. 1992. An empirical examination of ownership structure in family and professionally managed firms, Family Business Review, 5(2), 117–136.
49. Hall P.  1988. A historical overview of family firms in the Unites States. Family Business Review, 1, 51–68.
50. Poza E., Alfred T. and Maheshwari A. 1997. Stakeholder perceptions of culture and management practices in family and family firms – A preliminary report. Family Business Review, 10, 135–156.
51. Pervin A. 1997. A conversation with Henry Mintzberg. Family Business Review, 10, 185–198.
52. Eddleston K., Otondo R.  and Kellermanns F. 2008. Conflict, participative decision-making and generational ownership dispersion: A multilevel analysis. Journal of Small Business Management, 46, 457–485.
53. Hosmer L. 1995. Trust: The connecting link between organizational theory and philosophical ethics. Academy of Management Review, 20, 379–403.
54. Bennis W. and Goldsmith J. 1997. Learning to lead: A workbook on becoming a leader. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
55. Shaw R. 1997. Trust in the balance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
56. Lachapelle K. and Barnes L. 1998. The trust catalyst in the family-owned business. Family Business Review, 11, 1–18.
57. Danco L. 1975. Beyond survival. Cleveland: Center for Family Business.
58. De Visscher F., Aronoff C. and Ward J. 1995. Financing transitions: Managing capital and liquidity in the family business. Family business leadership series. Marietta: Business Owner Resources.
59. Anderson R.C. and Reeb D.M. 2003. Founding-family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the S&P 500. Journal of Finance, 58, 1301–1328.
60. Gallo M., Tapies J.  and  Cappuyns K. 2004. Comparison of family and non family business: Financial logic and personal preferences. Family Business Review, 17, 303–318.
61. Gallo M. and Vilaseca A. 1996. Finance in family business. Family Business Review, 9, 387–402.
62. McConaughy D., Walker M., Henderson G.  and Mishra C.  1995. Founding family controlled firms: Efficiency and value. In Paper presented at the European Financial Management Association.
63. Poutziouris P. 2001. The views of family companies on venture capital: Empirical evidence from the UK small to medium-size enterprising economy. Family Business Review, 14, 277–291.
64. McConaughy D. and Philips G. 1999. Founders versus descendants: The profitability, efficiency, growth. Characteristics and financing in large, public, founding family controlled firms. Family Business Review, 12, 123–132.
65. Lyman A. 1991. Customer service: Does family ownership make a difference? Family Business Review, 4, 303–324.
66. Poza E. 1995. A la Sombra del Roble: la Empresa Privada Familiar y su Continuidad. Ohio: Editorial Universitaria para la Empresa Familiar.
67. Stinnett N. 1983. Strong families: A portrait. In D. Mace (Ed.), Prevention in family services (pp. 27–38). Beverly Hills: Sage.
68. Stinnett N. 1986. Building family strengths: A manual for families. Lincoln: University of  Nebraska.

Feature man of the shadow economy
Volostnov N.S., Doctor of Economics, Professor of Economicsand Management, VolgaState Universityof Water Transport

Annotation:
In the article, based on the analysis of the shadow economy, its structure, the essence of its subjects: the person of the criminal and the victim.
Keywords: shadow economy, crime, fictitious, parapanova, extra-legal economy, economic man, the man is a criminal of the victim.

1. Avtonomov V.S. Chelovek v zerkaleekonomicheskoiteorii (ocherkistoriizapadnoiekonomicheskoimysli). – M. : Nauka, 1993.
2. Agapova I.I. Institucional'naya ekonomika.? M.: Magistr, 2009.
3. Auzan A.A. Institucional'naya ekonomika. Novaya institucional'naya ekonomicheskaya teoriya. ? M.: INFRA ? M, 2002.
4. Vasil'cova V.M., Tertyshnyi S.A. Institucional'naya ekonomika. – M.: Mirknig, 2013.
5. Bern, E. Igry, v kotoryeigrayutlyudi (psihologiyachelovecheskihotnoshenii. Lyudi, kotoryeigrayut v igry (psihologiyachelovecheskoisud'by). - SPb : Leningrad, 1992.
6. Avdiiskii, V.I., Dadalko, V.A. Tenevayaekonomikaiekonomicheskayabezopasnost' gosudarstva. ? M.: Al'fa? M :INFRA – M, 2012.
7. center-yf.ru/data/economy/Tenevaya-ekonomika.php
8. AntonyanYu.M. Kriminologiya. – M. :Yurait, 2014.
9. Kriminologiya. Pod red. V.N. Kudryavceva, V.E. Eminova. – M.: Yurist, 1997.
10. Bekker, G. Prestuplenieinakazanie: ekonomicheskiipodho. – M.: Istoki, 2000. Vyp.4.
11. Zhuravleva N.A. Psihologiyasocial'nyhizmenenii. Cennostnyipodhod. – M.: Izd-vo«Institutpsihologii RAN», 2013.
12. Kozyrev G.I. «Zhertva» v social'no?politicheskomkonflikte. – M. :Eksklibri – Press, 2008.
13. Odincova M.A. Psihologiyazhertvy. Skazkoterapiyadlyavzroslyh. – Samara :ID «Bahrah – M», 2015.
14. Rivman, D.V., Ustinov, V.S. Viktimologiya. – N.Novgorod :NYuI MVD RF, 1998.

BRIEF REPORTS

Рrosperity in «green» economy of Turkmenia
Penjiyev A.M., the doctor of agricultural sciences, the senior lecturer Turkmen state architecturally-building institute, Ashgabat, Turkmenistan
Penjiyev A.A., Governance manager, Governance Strengthening Project in Turkmenistan

Annotation:
This article are calculated and the map of wind power resources with their ecological, economic priorities on use of these installations, for the decision power, economic, ecological, social problems, also ecological business, possibility of softening of anthropogenous loadings in climate changes for realisation of government programs on a sustainable development in Turkmenia is made.
Keywords: renewed energy sources, ecological business, Turkmenia.

Referenses
1. Berdymuhamedov G.M. (2010) Of social and economic development of Turkmenistan. Volume 1. А: Turkmen state publishing service.P.450
2. Brensheyn L.S., Selyh A.N. Hybrid expert system with the computing module for the forecast of ecological situations. Works of the international symposium “Intellectual systems - InSis - 96”, Moscow, 1996г. P.350.1.     
3. Marchuk G.I. Matematicheskoe modelirovaniya v problemah okruzhayushei sredy. -M., Nauka, 1982.
4. Korablev A. D. Ekonomiya energoresursov v sel'skom hozyai­stve. — M.: Agropromizdat, 1988.
5. Pendzhiev A.M., Penzhiev A.A. Mezhdunarodnoe sotrudnichestvo v oblasti ohrany okruzhayushei sredy i ustoichivogo razvitiya na osnove vozobnovlyaemoi energetiki v Central'noi Azii // Al'ternativnaya energetika i ekologiya – ISJAEE. 2012. № 1. S 139–156.
6. Penzhiev A.M. Izmenenie klimata i vozmozhnosti umen'sheniya antropogennyh nagruzok. LAMBERT Academic Publishing, 2012.
7. Pendzhiev A.M. «Ekologicheskie problemy osvoeniya pustyn'». LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing 2014, - 226 s. ISBN: 978-3-8433-9325-6.
8. Pendzhiev A.M. Ekoenergeticheskie resursy vetrovoi energii v stranah sodruzhestva nezavisimyh gosudarstv// Al'ternativnaya energetika i ekologiya – ISJAEE. 2013. № 5. S. 129-150.
9. Pendzhiev A.M. Ekoenergeticheskie resursy solnechnoi energii v stranah sodruzhestva nezavisimyh gosudarstv // Al'ternativnaya energetika i ekologiya. 2013. № 5. S. 13-30.
10. Pendzhiev A.M. Koncepciya razvitiya vozobnovlyaemoi energetiki v Turkmenistane// «Al'ternativnaya energetika i ekologiya» № 08 (112) 2012. s. 91-102.
11. Pendzhiev A.M. Vozobnovlyaemaya energetika i ekologiya (obobshenie statei)//Mezhdunarodnyi nauchnyi zhurnal «Al'ternativnaya energetika i ekologiya» № 08 (148) 2014. S. 45-78.
12. Pendzhiev A.M. Mehanizm chistogo razvitiya: prioritety energoeffektivnosti v Turkmenistane. // «Al'ternativnaya energetika i ekologiya» № 10 (78) 2009, s.142-148.
13. Pendzhiev A.M. Perspektivy al'ternativnoi energetiki i ee ekologicheskii potencial v Turkmenistane. // «Al'ternativnaya energetika i ekologiya» № 9 (77) 2009. S.131-139.
14. Petrov K.M. Na puti k «zelenoi» ekonomike// «Biosfera», 2013, t.5, № 4, s.369-373.
15. Strebkov D.S., Pendzhiev A.M., Mamedsahatov B.D. Razvitie solnechnoi energetiki v Turkmenistane. Monografiya. M.: GNUVIESH, 2012. C.496 .
16. Smirnov B.M. Atmosfera Zemli i energetika. M.: Znanie, 1979. s.78.
17. Parnikovyi effekt, izmenenie klimata i ekosistemy. -L.: Gidrometioizdat,1989. s. 120.
18. Pervoe Nacional'noe soobshenie po ramochnoi konvencii OON ob izmenenii klimata. Faza 2. Narashivanie potenciala v prioritetnyh oblastyah ekonomiki Turkmenistana v svyazi s izmeneniem klimata. Proekt GF/2328-2724-4313 YuNEP / GEFTurkmenistan, Ashhabad. 2006. s.158.

The list of articles published in magazine
«Management in Russia and abroad» in 2015