Skip to main content

Atlas of digital platforms of social innovation projects

Authors

  • E.V. Popov Doctor of Economics, Российская академия народного хозяйства и государственной службы при Президенте Российской Федерации ORCID ID: 0000-0002-5513-5020
  • A.Yu. Veretennikova PhD in Economics, Российская академия народного хозяйства и государственной службы при Президенте Российской Федерации
  • Yu.Yu. Muhamedyanova магистрант Уральского федерального университета имени Первого президента России Б.Н.Ельцина

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25806/mevriz-156

Keywords:

social innovation, digital platforms, socio-innovative projects

Abstract

The aim of the research is a systematization of digital platforms which implement social innovation projects. The object of the research is the digital platforms of ongoing social innovation projects. The subject of the research is the economic relationship regarding the systematization of digital platforms. We have used system comparative analysis of published data as a method of research. The digital platforms of social innovation projects which are implemented in different countries have been chosen based on the analysis of published articles on the international database of scientific citation Scopus, Web of Science, JSTOR, and on the platform Digital Social Innovation. We have divided it into criteria of digitized resources and scale of activities. This classification is described as the atlas of digital platforms of social innovation projects. We have established that the number of information platforms at the national and global levels is much greater. However, labor, financial, material digital platforms at the local and global levels are less developed. The development of digital platforms at the national level is primarily a matter of necessity. After that we can use the experience of creating and developing digital platforms at the global level. The theoretical importance of this research lies in the systematization of digital platforms of ongoing social innovation projects. Its practical importance is the development of the applied capacity for the analysis of social innovation activity.

Информация о публикации

Финансирование: Исследование выполнено без привлечения внешнего финансирования, если иное не указано авторами.

Вклад авторов: Все авторы внесли существенный вклад в подготовку статьи, ознакомились с окончательной версией рукописи и одобрили ее к публикации.

Конфликт интересов: Авторы заявляют об отсутствии конфликта интересов, если иное не указано в публикации.

Правообладатель: ООО "Финпресс".

Условия использования. Полные тексты статей, опубликованных в журнале, распространяются по подписке. Все права защищены. Метаданные всех статей распространяются по открытой лицензии и могут свободно использоваться в информационных, научных и библиографических целях.

Машиночитаемый файл метаданных: JATS XML

Полная версия статьи доступна на сайте Научной электронной библиотеки eLIBRARY.RU: https://elibrary.ru/contents.asp?titleid=9628

References

1. Mahr D., Lievens A. Virtual lead user communities: Drivers of knowledge creation for innovation, Research Policy, 2012. – 41 (1). – Pp. 167–177.

2. Dinant I., Floch J., Vilarinho T., Oliveira M.F. Designing a Digital Social Innovation Platform: From Case Studies to Concepts LNCS, 2017. – 10673. – Pp. 101–118.

3. Nuccio M., Guerzoni M. Big data: Hell or heaven? Digital platforms and market power in the data-driven economy. Competition & Change, 2019. – 23 (3). – Pp. 312–328. – DOI: 10.1177/1024529418816525.

4. Murray R., Caulier-Grice J., Mulgar G. The Open Book of Social Innovation. Young Foundation / NESTA, London, 2010.

5. Klein A., Sorensen C., De Freitas A.S., Pedron C.D., Elaluf-Calderwood S. Understanding controversies in digital platform innovation processes: the Google Glass case, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2020. –

152. – Pp. 1–14 [Электронный ресурс]. URL: doi.org/10.1016/j

6. Gawer A., Cusumano A. Platform Leadership: How Intel, Microsoft, and Cisco drive Industry Innovation. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, Massachusetts, 2002.

7. Tiwana A., Konsynski B., Bush A.A. Research Commentary – Platform Evolution: coevolution of Platform Architecture, Governance, and Environmental Dynamics, Information Systems Research, 2010. – Vol.

21. – Pp. 675–687 [Электронный ресурс]. URL: doi.org/10.1287/isre.1100.0323

8. Yoo Y., Henfridsson O., Lyytinen K. The New Organizing Logic of Digital Innovation: an Agenda for Information Systems Research, Information Systems Research. – 2010. – Vol.

21. – 724–735 [Электронный ресурс]. URL: doi.org/10.1287/isre.ll00.0322

9. Bharadwaj A., El Sawy O.A., Pavlou P.A., Venkatraman N. Digital Business Strategy: toward a Next Generation of Insights. MIS Q, 2013. –

37. – Pp. 471–482.

10. Constantinides P., Henfridsson O., Parker G.G. Platforms and infrastructures in the Digital age. Information systems research. – 2018. – 29 (2). – Pp. 381–400.

11. De Reuver M., Sorensen C., Basole R.C. The digital platform: a research agenda, Journal of Information Technology, 2018, June, pp. 1–12 [Электронный ресурс]. URL: doi.org/10.1057/s41265–016–0033–3

12. Bria F., Almirall E., Gascó M., Baeck P., Halpin H. & Kresin F. Digital social innovation (Interim Report). Brussels: European Commission, 2014.

13. Halpin H., Bria F. Crowdmapping Digital Social Innovation with Linked Data. ESWC 2015, LNCS 9088. – Pp. 606–620. – DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-18818-837.

14. Passani A., Spagnoli F., Bellini F., Prampolini A. Collective Awareness Platform for Sustainability and Social Innovation (CAPS) Understanding Them and Analysing Their Impacts, Project: Impact Assessment for Social Innovation (IA4SI), 2016. – DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-22921-8_9.

15. Murray R., Mulgan G., Caulier-grice J. How to innovate: the tools for social innovation, NESTA & The Young Foundation, 2010. Available at: youngfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/How-to-innovate-the-tools-for-social-innovation.pdf

16. Senyo P.K., Effah J., Osabutey E.L.C. Digital platformisation as public sector transformation strategy: A case of Ghana’s paperless port, Technological Forecasting & Social Change. – 2021. –

162. – 120387.

17. Ciulli1 F., Kolk A., Boe-Lillegraven S. Circularity Brokers: Digital Platform Organizations and Waste Recovery in Food Supply Chains, Journal of Business Ethics. – 2020. –

167. – Pp. 299–331 [Электронный ресурс]. URL: doi.org/10.1007/s10551–019–04160–5

18. Popov E.V. Institutional Atlas. Atlantic Economic Journal, 2011. – 39 (4). – Pp. 445–446.

Published

2021-10-15